True cost of police grasses is revealed
THEY are notoriously known the world over as grasses, snitches, squealers, or by their official title of Covert Human Information Sources.
Their details are cloaked in secrecy – as you'd expect as a source of crucial insider information in the fight against organised crime.
-

-

Undated handout image of Snoop Dogg as Huggy Bear from the film Strasky and Hutch. PA Photo:
-

Pictured:
Posed by members of staff
Brief. POLICE INFORMANT MOCK UP PIC Reporter. Na Category. News Date. Thursday, December 31 Time. 11am Address. Etruria Park
PICTURE BY WESLEY WEBSTER
-

CASH IN HAND: Money is passed to the grass Picture posed by models
Trying to find out how many of them exist and how much each of them earns is nigh on impossible because of fears their identities could be compromised.
But call them what you like, and most do because of the criminally devious "rat on a rat" nature of their actions, because it won't bother them too much.
This is because they are making some serious cash selling their information about co-conspirators to officers.
In Kent alone they are receiving more than £222,000 every year as they tip police off about drug deals, people trafficking and prostitution.
The Courier can reveal in the last nine years Kent Police has spent £2,003,202 on informants – a total of £222,578 each year – or £609.80 per day.
The force refused to say how many "Huggy Bears", the infamous super-grass from 70s TV series Starsky and Hutch, it had on its books or how much the highest and lowest paid grasses in the county were earning.
Surprisingly, the force also refused to discuss its use of informants or answer specific questions on the tactics involved.
Instead it said it backed a statement by the Association of Chief Police Officers which states "informers are a vital weapon in the fight against crime".
Patricia Gallan, ACPO's National Source Working Group chairman, said the use of informants had proved essential in cases ranging from serious organised crime to burglary.
She said: "Each force is audited on their use of informants and is subject to a robust annual inspection.
"They are a valuable source of intelligence and their use is justifiable and proportionate when set against other police tactics."
The use of Covert Human Intelligence Sources is a well-known police tactic in catching criminals who believe they are beyond the long arm of the law.
Forces can pay criminal contacts for information necessary in bringing successful prosecutions and detectives say the confidential deals are vital to cracking tough cases and securing convictions.
But the practice has developed considerably from the Life on Mars style of bunging a source £20 after meeting in a pub.
The payment of money, which comes from the police budget, is strictly governed by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act.
The real names, aliases and sums paid to grasses are kept in a register, which can only be seen by a very small number of officers who have been vetted in line with national standards.
Individual officers are banned from having informants.
Instead, sources are closely monitored by specialist informant handling teams tasked with looking after their welfare and assessing the quality and importance of the information they provide.
This information is then used by police as part of their investigations. But it is never treated as evidence and the source is never required to testify in court.
The figures, obtained using Freedom of Information rules, do not include payments made by other agencies such as the security services.
Although £2million in nine years may seem an awful lot of cash to give to grasses, Kent Police does not spent as much as some other forces.
The Metropolitan Police, which covers Greater London, spends that amount every year.











7 Comments
View all
by K, Tonbridge
Tuesday, March 16 2010, 9:59PM
“The truth about M. Jara and people like him is that he thinks that someone whom he considers to be in a minority has been oppressed. He feels that this group of people cannot defend themselves, so he must be offended on his behalf and therefore leap to his defence to make a complaint. Just like everyone who refused to refer to coffee without milk as "black coffee" as they thought the expression was racist. Just like everyone who calls Christmas "Winterval" or similar for fear of offending those of other religions.
M Jara didn't realise that in drawing attention to the actor's skin colour and race, and assuming that this was in some way significant to the choice of photo, he was himself being racist.”
by micheal x, london
Tuesday, March 16 2010, 6:12PM
“spot on m jara the blackman has been stereotyped for far to long”
by shocked, Paddock Wood
Tuesday, March 16 2010, 1:25PM
“OMG M Jara what a twit you are - I am sure the actor would be pleased that after all this time his role as Huggy Bear is remembered - nothing to do with the colour of his skin - its people like you who escalate racial problems - find real racism if you want to get on your soap box then you may get support on your views”
by Antonio Fargas, The Pits
Tuesday, March 16 2010, 9:04AM
“I am an urban informer. I am not a snitch”
by anon, Kent
Monday, March 15 2010, 6:23PM
“Thanks for that M Jara.
You dont work for the BBC do you.
Get a life and get a sense of humour while your at it.”