Masked protesters pledge to target 'insidious spy car'
A BAND of masked motorcyclists are poised to descend on Tunbridge Wells to spy on the council's new CCTV car.
The campaign group, which includes a taxi driver, a lawyer, a plumber and a retired salesman, are opposed to the Smart car set to be unleashed by Tunbridge Wells Borough Council on our town's streets this summer.
-

Motorcycle group who follow Camera Cars around. Pictured outside Medway Council depot in Strood.
-

PARKING OFFENSIVE: Members of the anti-CCTV car campaign group No To Mob on an earlier protest outside Medway Council's depot in Strood GITB20110223A-018_CNEW
-

ENFORCEMENT: A CCTV car will soon be coming to Tunbridge Wells's streets
Town Hall chiefs agreed to splash out on the Smart car with a rooftop-mounted CCTV camera, following a behind-closed-doors meeting on Thursday.
The cars, which have proved controversial when introduced in other areas, are aimed at detecting motoring offences. They are due to come to Tunbridge Wells by July.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
CCTV cars record video footage of offences such as parking on double yellow lines or driving in prohibited areas, and offenders are sent a fine in the post.
Sporting high visibility jackets and plastic masks like those in the film V For Vendetta, the No To Mob group argues that councils employ the vehicle as a "cash cow" and not for public safety reasons .
The riders say they are doing their bit for David Cameron's "big society" by pointing out where the cameras are hiding.
Linda Shaw, a member of the No To Mob group, said: "The cars aren't for public safety – it's another revenue stream for the council.
"They are insidious and have a damaging effect – sucking the life out of towns."
The No To Mob organise regular meet ups or "schunts" throughout the South- East where CCTV cars roam the streets.
They have already forced two councils into refunding a combined total of more than £2 million through tribunals.
On Tuesday, Hertfordshire County Council had to pay out £1.26m for wrongly issued fines after it was ruled the signage in a bus lane in Hemel Hempstead was unclear and illegal. The camera had snapped an estimated 35,000 people since going live last August.
And in November last year, Richmond's council in south-west London reimbursed an estimated £1 million after CCTV camera cars were behind more than 18,500 wrongly-issued parking fines. Its four Smart cars were then taken off the road.
"We're not against parking enforcement, we're just against revenue driven enforcement," added Mrs Shaw, from Rochester.
"They are a waste of money – we will be on them from the first day."
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council used the car for a five-day trial in December, during which it did not hand out fines.
In one six-minute period, 101 contraventions were spotted around the Five Ways bus lane.
The borough council's head of economic development David Candlin said the car would boost the Tunbridge Wells is Traffic Aware campaign.
He said: "The CCTV car raises the profile of our safety campaign and it is a real deterrent to those motorists who risk the safety of others by choosing to flout traffic regulations.
"The expectation is that the safety camera car will lead to a change in motorists' behaviour. Anything which reduces the number of people injured on roads in the borough must be welcomed."




Comments
by MrSwing
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 10:55PM
“You are right there are better ways to successfully challenge a parking ticket-I know I have done it several times but I was just trying to make a point .
Incidently I always keep my powder dry and a musket ball is great leverage so yes I do feel lucky.”
by DickyLack
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 6:00PM
“Also - its not the court that's issuing the fine. The council is given powers to do that on the basis that it's no longer a criminal offence. The only reason the courts get involved is if you refuse to pay they will either make an enforcement to pay, or make a judgement on whether the council issued a ticket according to the procedures laid down.”
by DickyLack
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 5:51PM
“Now you see what you're brandishing there is a 325 year old musket...with a damp powder charge.
While the Bill of Right still has primacy in English Law, it's buried so far under later statutes that you'll need to go the Law Lords before you find a judge capable of accepting that defense. That's an army of Barristers and years of waiting around to be heard while your house is repossessed.
Sure - your musket has found it's mark a few times in living memory. But let me ask you a question: "Do you feel lucky, punk?"
My point was that councils aren't like private campers. They have special provisions on the books which allow them to pull, and enforce this SH!t. There are plenty less audacious ways of overturning a parking ticket than invoking the 1689 BoR. As far as anything from a private company is concerned, recent changes in legislation mean that you can safely ignore their letters.”
by MrSwing
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 4:47PM
“Whilst I agree with you on the majority of your post especially the shooting fish in a barrel comment we need to look beyond their statutes and instead refer to our law of the land.
The Bill of Rights enshrines our rights and our relationship with the state and is as valid today as it was in December 1689.
On fines it clearly says ...." all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void"
No conviction No fine.”
by DickyLack
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 1:01PM
“Well that's not entirely true Mr Swing. TWBC do have statutory powers to hand out fines for parking and moving traffic offences. You could make your representations to the court but they would work on the assumption that the ticket would be valid. Since these offences were de-criminalised it's become a lot like shooting fish in a barrel for councils. One of these cars pays for itself in a few weeks.”
by MrSwing
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 12:55PM
“Only the courts can issue fines so any fine they issue will be invalid.
If you see the scamera car take a picture of the stasi occupants because they hate when the boot is on the other foot.”
by DickyLack
Tuesday, June 26 2012, 12:25PM
“Would love to see them forced into keeping the vehicle and re-allocating it to dealing with crime and anti-social behaviour. Good idea. Wrong motivation and definitely the wrong targets. Can't say I care how many people violate the traffic flow at Fiveways in Tunbridge Wells. Since it was clearly designed by a toddler.”
by MrSwing
Friday, April 27 2012, 9:36PM
“Well done guys.
Its nothing to do with safety but everything to do with revenue raising.
Which sad act power crazed idiot is going to volunteer to do the most hated job in the country I wonder.”
by Theengineer36
Friday, April 27 2012, 9:25PM
“Well done Notomob. We need more of the likes of you to stop town hall petty tyranny which seems so prevalent these days.”
by TheRanter
Friday, April 27 2012, 6:22PM
“Love these guys. I have seen them in action around Medway - keep up the pressure, why on earth T-Wells council sees fit to waste thousands on this snoop-mobile is beyond common sense. Cue pictures of the car parked illegally al over the shop!”